Abstract
To monitor processes under automatic process control (APC), several joint monitoring schemes have recently been proposed, such as the U statistics, U 0 and U∞, that originate from the uniformly most powerful test. It is known that the U0 chart is sensitive to large shift detection whereas the U∞, chart is sensitive to small shift detection. To take advantage of both charts, this paper examines a combined use of the two U charts. A comparative study indicates that the combined procedure improves over a single U chart and performs better than other joint monitoring schemes, including Hotelling's T2 chart for APC processes.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 939-952 |
| Number of pages | 14 |
| Journal | Quality and Reliability Engineering International |
| Volume | 22 |
| Issue number | 8 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Dec 2006 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 9 Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure
Keywords
- Hotelling's T chart
- MMSE control
- Multivariate SPC
- PI control
- Principle component analysis
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'A comparative study of joint monitoring schemes for APC processes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver