A Comparative Study of Spreadsheet Applications on Mobile Devices

Veera V.S.M. Chintapalli; Wenyuan Tao; Zhaopeng Meng; Kang Zhang; Jun Kong; Yue Ge

doi:10.1155/2016/9816152

A Comparative Study of Spreadsheet Applications on Mobile Devices

Veera V.S.M. Chintapalli, Wenyuan Tao^*, Zhaopeng Meng, Kang Zhang, Jun Kong, Yue Ge

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal Article › peer-review

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Advances in mobile screen sizes and feature enhancement for mobile applications have increased the number of users accessing spreadsheets on mobile devices. This paper reports a comparative usability study on four popular mobile spreadsheet applications: OfficeSuite Viewer 6, Documents To Go, ThinkFree Online, and Google Drive. We compare them against three categories of usability criteria: visibility; navigation, scrolling, and feedback; and interaction, satisfaction, simplicity, and convenience. Measures for each criterion were derived in a survey. Questionnaires were designed to address the measures based on the comparative criteria provided in the analysis.

Original language	English
Article number	9816152
Journal	Mobile Information Systems
Volume	2016
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/9816152
Publication status	Published - 2016
Externally published	Yes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Veera V. S. M. Chintapalli et al.

Access to Document

10.1155/2016/9816152

Cite this

@article{2b4dac2156e1434fa929cde460ae8d3d,

title = "A Comparative Study of Spreadsheet Applications on Mobile Devices",

abstract = "Advances in mobile screen sizes and feature enhancement for mobile applications have increased the number of users accessing spreadsheets on mobile devices. This paper reports a comparative usability study on four popular mobile spreadsheet applications: OfficeSuite Viewer 6, Documents To Go, ThinkFree Online, and Google Drive. We compare them against three categories of usability criteria: visibility; navigation, scrolling, and feedback; and interaction, satisfaction, simplicity, and convenience. Measures for each criterion were derived in a survey. Questionnaires were designed to address the measures based on the comparative criteria provided in the analysis.",

author = "Chintapalli, \{Veera V.S.M.\} and Wenyuan Tao and Zhaopeng Meng and Kang Zhang and Jun Kong and Yue Ge",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2016 Veera V. S. M. Chintapalli et al.",

year = "2016",

doi = "10.1155/2016/9816152",

language = "English",

volume = "2016",

journal = "Mobile Information Systems",

issn = "1574-017X",

publisher = "Hindawi Limited",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Comparative Study of Spreadsheet Applications on Mobile Devices

AU - Chintapalli, Veera V.S.M.

AU - Tao, Wenyuan

AU - Meng, Zhaopeng

AU - Zhang, Kang

AU - Kong, Jun

AU - Ge, Yue

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Advances in mobile screen sizes and feature enhancement for mobile applications have increased the number of users accessing spreadsheets on mobile devices. This paper reports a comparative usability study on four popular mobile spreadsheet applications: OfficeSuite Viewer 6, Documents To Go, ThinkFree Online, and Google Drive. We compare them against three categories of usability criteria: visibility; navigation, scrolling, and feedback; and interaction, satisfaction, simplicity, and convenience. Measures for each criterion were derived in a survey. Questionnaires were designed to address the measures based on the comparative criteria provided in the analysis.

AB - Advances in mobile screen sizes and feature enhancement for mobile applications have increased the number of users accessing spreadsheets on mobile devices. This paper reports a comparative usability study on four popular mobile spreadsheet applications: OfficeSuite Viewer 6, Documents To Go, ThinkFree Online, and Google Drive. We compare them against three categories of usability criteria: visibility; navigation, scrolling, and feedback; and interaction, satisfaction, simplicity, and convenience. Measures for each criterion were derived in a survey. Questionnaires were designed to address the measures based on the comparative criteria provided in the analysis.

UR - https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:000370780800001

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84959419053

U2 - 10.1155/2016/9816152

DO - 10.1155/2016/9816152

M3 - Journal Article

SN - 1574-017X

VL - 2016

JO - Mobile Information Systems

JF - Mobile Information Systems

M1 - 9816152

ER -

A Comparative Study of Spreadsheet Applications on Mobile Devices

Abstract

Bibliographical note

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this