Analyst Forecast Consistency

Gilles Hilary*, Charles Hsu

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal Articlepeer-review

Abstract

We show empirically that analysts who display more consistent forecast errors have greater ability to affect prices, and that this effect is larger than that of stated accuracy. These results lead to three implications. First, consistent analysts are less likely to be demoted and are more likely to be nominated All Star analysts. Second, analysts strategically deliver downward-biased forecasts to increase their consistency (if at the expense of stated accuracy). Finally, the benefits of consistency and of "lowballing" (accuracy) are increasing (decreasing) in institutional investors' presence.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)271-297
Number of pages27
JournalJournal of Finance
Volume68
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2013

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Analyst Forecast Consistency'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this