Are Capital Market Anomalies Common to Equity and Corporate Bond Markets? An Empirical Investigation

Tarun Chordia, Amit Goyal*, Yoshio Nozawa, Avanidhar Subrahmanyam, Qing Tong

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

71 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Corporate bond returns exhibit predictability in a manner consistent with efficient pricing. Many equity characteristics, such as accruals, standardized unexpected earnings, and idiosyncratic volatility, do not impact bond returns. Profitability and asset growth are negatively related to corporate bond returns. Because firms that are profitable or have high asset growth (and hence more collateral) should be less risky, with lower required returns, the evidence accords with the risk-reward paradigm. Past equity returns are positively related to bond returns, indicating that equities lead bonds. Cross-sectional bond return predictors generally do not provide materially high Sharpe ratios after accounting for trading costs.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1301-1342
Number of pages42
JournalJournal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis
Volume52
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Aug 2017
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Michael G. Foster School of Business, University of Washington.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Are Capital Market Anomalies Common to Equity and Corporate Bond Markets? An Empirical Investigation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this