TY - JOUR
T1 - Chemical-enhanced washing for remediation of soils contaminated with marine diesel fuel in the presence/absence of Pb
AU - Zhang, Weihua
AU - Lo, Irene M.C.
PY - 2007
Y1 - 2007
N2 - The effects of the operating conditions, the initial concentrations of marine diesel fuel (MDF) and the coexisting Pb in the soil, and the ethylene diamine tetra acetic salt (EDTA) in solution on MDF removal by sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) washing were extensively investigated with the aim of optimizing the process parameters and determining the MDF removal efficiency by SDS under different contamination conditions. The experimental results from, batch tests indicated that the majority of MDF was removed by SDS in the first 2 h, and its optimal pH was nearly neutral. Increasing the SDS concentration linearly increased the MDF removal efficiency. At a given SDS concentration, the removal efficiency was dependent on the existing forms of MDF in soils, and the free phase of MDF was found, to be more easily removed than, the adsorbed phase. MDF removal by SDS was significantly reduced by the coexisting Pb in soils, which likely forms a complexation with SDS and thereby enhances the partitioning of MDF in the soil by the re-adsorption of released MDF onto the hydrophobic tails of the adsorbed SDS. EDTA alone, or with SDS, could remove MDF, but the remaining MDF in the contaminated soil after EDTA washing became more difficult to be removed by SDS. Therefore, the EDTA washing followed by SDS washing is not recommended for MDF removal.
AB - The effects of the operating conditions, the initial concentrations of marine diesel fuel (MDF) and the coexisting Pb in the soil, and the ethylene diamine tetra acetic salt (EDTA) in solution on MDF removal by sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) washing were extensively investigated with the aim of optimizing the process parameters and determining the MDF removal efficiency by SDS under different contamination conditions. The experimental results from, batch tests indicated that the majority of MDF was removed by SDS in the first 2 h, and its optimal pH was nearly neutral. Increasing the SDS concentration linearly increased the MDF removal efficiency. At a given SDS concentration, the removal efficiency was dependent on the existing forms of MDF in soils, and the free phase of MDF was found, to be more easily removed than, the adsorbed phase. MDF removal by SDS was significantly reduced by the coexisting Pb in soils, which likely forms a complexation with SDS and thereby enhances the partitioning of MDF in the soil by the re-adsorption of released MDF onto the hydrophobic tails of the adsorbed SDS. EDTA alone, or with SDS, could remove MDF, but the remaining MDF in the contaminated soil after EDTA washing became more difficult to be removed by SDS. Therefore, the EDTA washing followed by SDS washing is not recommended for MDF removal.
KW - Adsorption
KW - Diesel fuels
KW - Heavy metals
KW - Organic matter
KW - Soil pollution
KW - Spills
KW - Surface-active agents
UR - https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:000245832800011
UR - https://openalex.org/W2098596839
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/34247508740
U2 - 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2007)133:5(548)
DO - 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2007)133:5(548)
M3 - Journal Article
SN - 0733-9372
VL - 133
SP - 548
EP - 555
JO - Journal of Environmental Engineering
JF - Journal of Environmental Engineering
IS - 5
ER -