TY - JOUR
T1 - Dimethyl carbonate/methanol separation by azeotropic distillation with water
T2 - An alternative process driven by low-pressure steam
AU - Lyu, Hao
AU - Hu, Yongxin
AU - Zhou, Teng
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2025/3/1
Y1 - 2025/3/1
N2 - This study reported a conceptual design of dimethyl carbonate/methanol (DMC/MET) separation via an azeotropic distillation (AD) process with water as the entrainer. Water can form a minimum azeotrope with DMC, stripping DMC from MET via a distillation column. Meanwhile, the liquid–liquid equilibrium can lift the DMC fraction from the azeotropic composition to a much higher level with a decanter. It enables the subsequent distillation column to produce pure DMC. The techno-economic analysis after process optimization demonstrated that the total annualized cost (TAC) of the AD process is 13.8 % lower than the conventional extractive distillation (ED) process. Subsequently, heat integration and double-effect distillation were introduced to further increase the energy efficiency. The improved AD process is also superior to the improved ED process (31.7 % energy cost and 4.1 % TAC saved). Moreover, the moderate temperature of the reboilers of the AD process with water as the entrainer further elevates its superiority since industrial waste heat can be applied in this case.
AB - This study reported a conceptual design of dimethyl carbonate/methanol (DMC/MET) separation via an azeotropic distillation (AD) process with water as the entrainer. Water can form a minimum azeotrope with DMC, stripping DMC from MET via a distillation column. Meanwhile, the liquid–liquid equilibrium can lift the DMC fraction from the azeotropic composition to a much higher level with a decanter. It enables the subsequent distillation column to produce pure DMC. The techno-economic analysis after process optimization demonstrated that the total annualized cost (TAC) of the AD process is 13.8 % lower than the conventional extractive distillation (ED) process. Subsequently, heat integration and double-effect distillation were introduced to further increase the energy efficiency. The improved AD process is also superior to the improved ED process (31.7 % energy cost and 4.1 % TAC saved). Moreover, the moderate temperature of the reboilers of the AD process with water as the entrainer further elevates its superiority since industrial waste heat can be applied in this case.
KW - Azeotropic distillation
KW - Dimethyl carbonate/methanol separation
KW - Extractive distillation
KW - Heat integration
KW - Process intensification
KW - Process optimization
UR - https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:001318038900001
UR - https://openalex.org/W4402438200
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85204033610
U2 - 10.1016/j.seppur.2024.129677
DO - 10.1016/j.seppur.2024.129677
M3 - Journal Article
SN - 1383-5866
VL - 355
JO - Separation and Purification Technology
JF - Separation and Purification Technology
M1 - 129677
ER -