TY - GEN
T1 - Estimation over wireless sensor networks
T2 - 17th World Congress, International Federation of Automatic Control, IFAC
AU - Shi, Ling
AU - Johansson, Karl Henrik
AU - Murray, Richard M.
PY - 2008
Y1 - 2008
N2 - In this paper we consider a state estimation problem over a wireless sensor network. A fusion center dynamically forms a local multi-hop tree of sensors and fuses the data into a state estimate. It is shown that the optimal estimator over a sensor tree is given by a Kalman filter of certain structure. Using estimation quality as a metric, two communication schemes are studied and compared. In scheme one, sensor nodes communicate measurement data to their parent nodes, while in scheme two, sensor nodes communicate their local state estimates to their parent nodes. We show that under perfect communication links, the two schemes produce the same estimate at the fusion center with unlimited computation at each sensor node; scheme one is always better than scheme two with limited computation. When data packet drops occur on the communication links, we show that scheme two always outperforms scheme one with unlimited computation; with limited computation, we show that there exists a critical packet arrival rate, above which, scheme one outperforms scheme two. Simulations are provided to demonstrate the two schemes under various circumstances.
AB - In this paper we consider a state estimation problem over a wireless sensor network. A fusion center dynamically forms a local multi-hop tree of sensors and fuses the data into a state estimate. It is shown that the optimal estimator over a sensor tree is given by a Kalman filter of certain structure. Using estimation quality as a metric, two communication schemes are studied and compared. In scheme one, sensor nodes communicate measurement data to their parent nodes, while in scheme two, sensor nodes communicate their local state estimates to their parent nodes. We show that under perfect communication links, the two schemes produce the same estimate at the fusion center with unlimited computation at each sensor node; scheme one is always better than scheme two with limited computation. When data packet drops occur on the communication links, we show that scheme two always outperforms scheme one with unlimited computation; with limited computation, we show that there exists a critical packet arrival rate, above which, scheme one outperforms scheme two. Simulations are provided to demonstrate the two schemes under various circumstances.
KW - Control under communication constraints
KW - Control under computation constraints
KW - Sensor networks
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/79961017946
U2 - 10.3182/20080706-5-KR-1001.2609
DO - 10.3182/20080706-5-KR-1001.2609
M3 - Conference Paper published in a book
AN - SCOPUS:79961017946
SN - 9783902661005
T3 - IFAC Proceedings Volumes (IFAC-PapersOnline)
BT - Proceedings of the 17th World Congress, International Federation of Automatic Control, IFAC
Y2 - 6 July 2008 through 11 July 2008
ER -