TY - JOUR
T1 - Evaluating the robustness of self-consolidating concrete
T2 - An approach to the mix design procedure
AU - Rissardi, Cristyan Zenato
AU - Gil, Augusto Masiero
AU - Ehrenbring, Hinoel Zamis
AU - Li, Zongjin
AU - Tutikian, Bernardo Fonseca
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 fib. International Federation for Structural Concrete.
PY - 2022/6
Y1 - 2022/6
N2 - This paper aimed to develop a method to analyze and rank self-consolidating concrete (SCC) according to its robustness, considering isolated and simultaneous variations in its main components, like water (±6%) and cement content (ΔC±), in three matrices with binder to aggregate ratio (rich, intermediate and poor). In the experimental campaign, only water variations (±6%) were considered, and the cement content variations were considered in the analytical method. The method regarded the behavior of SCC in fresh and hardened states and turned out to be potentially useful to the academic community and the industry. The simple additive weighting method was used for that reason, which is probably the most adopted among methods for decisions with multiple variables due to its simplicity. Among the families studied, the poor mixture presented the lowest robustness with variation in water content due to the higher initial w/c ratio. However, for the condition ΔC±, the poor mixture achieved the second-best robustness index. The rich mixture behaved differently as it was ranked second for ±6% of water and the worst for ΔC± due to slump-flow and segregation results. The intermediate matrix presented the highest robustness in both conditions analyzed, water (±6%), and cement content (ΔC±).
AB - This paper aimed to develop a method to analyze and rank self-consolidating concrete (SCC) according to its robustness, considering isolated and simultaneous variations in its main components, like water (±6%) and cement content (ΔC±), in three matrices with binder to aggregate ratio (rich, intermediate and poor). In the experimental campaign, only water variations (±6%) were considered, and the cement content variations were considered in the analytical method. The method regarded the behavior of SCC in fresh and hardened states and turned out to be potentially useful to the academic community and the industry. The simple additive weighting method was used for that reason, which is probably the most adopted among methods for decisions with multiple variables due to its simplicity. Among the families studied, the poor mixture presented the lowest robustness with variation in water content due to the higher initial w/c ratio. However, for the condition ΔC±, the poor mixture achieved the second-best robustness index. The rich mixture behaved differently as it was ranked second for ±6% of water and the worst for ΔC± due to slump-flow and segregation results. The intermediate matrix presented the highest robustness in both conditions analyzed, water (±6%), and cement content (ΔC±).
KW - mixture design method
KW - robustness index
KW - self-consolidating concrete
UR - https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:000621458800001
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85101105203
U2 - 10.1002/suco.202000566
DO - 10.1002/suco.202000566
M3 - Journal Article
AN - SCOPUS:85101105203
SN - 1464-4177
VL - 23
SP - 1933
EP - 1946
JO - Structural Concrete
JF - Structural Concrete
IS - 3
ER -