TY - JOUR
T1 - Foundation Models as Assistive Tools in Hydrometeorology
T2 - Opportunities, Challenges, and Perspectives
AU - Zhang, Lujia
AU - Song, Yurong
AU - Cui, Hanzhe
AU - Lu, Mengqian
AU - Li, Chenyue
AU - Yuan, Binhang
AU - Wang, Bin
AU - Lall, Upmanu
AU - Yang, Jing
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Author(s).
PY - 2025/4
Y1 - 2025/4
N2 - Most state-of-the-art AI applications in hydrometeorology are based on classic deep learning approaches. However, such approaches cannot automatically integrate multiple functions to construct a single intelligent agent, as each function is enabled by a separate model trained on independent data sets. Foundation models (FMs), which can process diverse inputs and perform different tasks, present a substantial opportunity to overcome this challenge. In this commentary, we evaluate how three state-of-the-art FMs, specifically GPT-4o, Claude 3.5 Sonnet, and Gemini 1.5 Pro, perform across four key task types in hydrometeorology: data processing, event diagnosis, forecast and prediction, and decision-making. The models perform well in the first two task types and offer valuable information for decision-makers but still face challenges in generating reliable forecasts. Moreover, this commentary highlights the concerns regarding the use of FMs: hallucination, responsibility, over-reliance, and openness. Finally, we propose that enhancing human-AI collaboration and developing domain-specific FMs could drive the future of FM applications in hydrometeorology. We also provide specific recommendations to achieve the perspectives.
AB - Most state-of-the-art AI applications in hydrometeorology are based on classic deep learning approaches. However, such approaches cannot automatically integrate multiple functions to construct a single intelligent agent, as each function is enabled by a separate model trained on independent data sets. Foundation models (FMs), which can process diverse inputs and perform different tasks, present a substantial opportunity to overcome this challenge. In this commentary, we evaluate how three state-of-the-art FMs, specifically GPT-4o, Claude 3.5 Sonnet, and Gemini 1.5 Pro, perform across four key task types in hydrometeorology: data processing, event diagnosis, forecast and prediction, and decision-making. The models perform well in the first two task types and offer valuable information for decision-makers but still face challenges in generating reliable forecasts. Moreover, this commentary highlights the concerns regarding the use of FMs: hallucination, responsibility, over-reliance, and openness. Finally, we propose that enhancing human-AI collaboration and developing domain-specific FMs could drive the future of FM applications in hydrometeorology. We also provide specific recommendations to achieve the perspectives.
KW - application
KW - artificial intelligence
KW - foundation model
KW - hydrometeorology
UR - https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:001466155200001
UR - https://openalex.org/W4409402521
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105002434747
U2 - 10.1029/2024WR039553
DO - 10.1029/2024WR039553
M3 - Comment/debate
SN - 0043-1397
VL - 61
JO - Water Resources Research
JF - Water Resources Research
IS - 4
M1 - e2024WR039553
ER -