Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Heidegger, Formal Indication, and Sexual Difference

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal Articlepeer-review

Abstract

This contribution unfolds an existential-ontological response to the question of sexual difference in the context of Heidegger’s formally indicative concept of “Dasein.” The question of Dasein’s “neutrality” concerns how formal indication formalizes, empties, and neutralizes the givenness of factical human existence. Ostensibly “given” biological and anthropological facts, such as sexual difference, are interpreted from an emptied and neutralized perspective that appears abstract and fictional to Heidegger’s critics. How, then, is the “neutrality” of formalizing emptying related to the “facticity” of in each case factically existing as a sexual and gendered being? The answer lies in Heidegger’s elucidation of the existential-ontological structure of Dasein: Dasein is always relationally instituted in its factical entangled life through “being-with.” The sexual difference of human existence is not merely biologically or anthropologically given, but disclosed and enacted according to one’s relations with others, the environment, and oneself. The formally indicating concept “Dasein” indicates, accordingly, the concrete diversity and plurality of individuated sexual and gendered ways of being.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)65-77
JournalEksistenz
Volume1
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2022

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Heidegger, Formal Indication, and Sexual Difference'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this