Hermes: Supporting argumentative discourse in multi-agent decision making

Nikos Karacapilidis*, Dimitris Papadias

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to conferenceConference Paperpeer-review

36 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper describes HERMES, a system that enhances group decision making by providing an argumentation framework to the agents involved. The system organizes the existing knowledge in a discussion graph, which consists of issues, alternatives, positions and preference relations. Argumentation is performed through a set of discourse acts which trigger appropriate procedures for the propagation of information in the graph. HERMES is able to handle incomplete, qualitative and inconsistent information, and provides mechanisms for weighing arguments.

Original languageEnglish
Pages827-832
Number of pages6
Publication statusPublished - 1998
Externally publishedYes
EventProceedings of the 1998 15th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI - Madison, WI, USA
Duration: 26 Jul 199830 Jul 1998

Conference

ConferenceProceedings of the 1998 15th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI
CityMadison, WI, USA
Period26/07/9830/07/98

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Hermes: Supporting argumentative discourse in multi-agent decision making'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this