Influence of grinding process on semiconductor chip strength

Enboa Wu, I. G. Shih, Y. N. Chen, S. C. Chen, C. Z. Tsai, C. A. Shao

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal Articlepeer-review

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to study the strength distribution of semiconductor chips on a wafer, and the influence of the back-side grinding process on the chip strength. The three-point bending test, complying with the ASTM standard E855, was adopted to measure the chip strength. The first set of test vehicles is from three 8-inch wafers. One is of 28 mils thick without backside grinding, and the other two are backside ground to 18 mils and 11 mils thick. Then, four 6-inch wafers were used as the second set of test vehicles. The first two were 22 mils thick which were backside ground and the other two wafers were 27 mils in thickness without grinding. The third set of test vehicles was formed by three 8-inch wafers of identical thickness (11-mil) and size, but they were backside ground by different factories. It is found that, whereas the chip strength distributed randomly on a wafer which did not experience any backside grinding, any wafers that were subjected to backside grinding always resulted in weak regions. The averaged strength for the chips in the weak region was approximately 30% lower than the averaged strength calculated from the whole wafer, regardless of the chip dimension. This phenomenon is independent of wafer thickness to be ground, wafer diameter, backside grinding equipment and process, existence of metal and passivation layers, etc. Meanwhile, this weak region, in the shape of a pair of sectors, is axisymmetric to the wafer center.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1617-1621
Number of pages5
JournalProceedings - Electronic Components and Technology Conference
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2002
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Influence of grinding process on semiconductor chip strength'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this