TY - JOUR
T1 - Investigation of the acoustic installation effects of an open-jet anechoic wind tunnel using computational aeroacoustics
AU - Redonnet, S.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2020/12/1
Y1 - 2020/12/1
N2 - This study focuses on acoustic installation effects that may occur during airframe noise experiments conducted in a typical open-jet anechoic wind tunnel, exemplified here by the NASA Langley Quiet Flow Facility (QFF). These acoustic installation effects are assessed through numerical simulation, using Computational Aeroacoustics (CAA). CAA calculations involve either elementary or complex noise sources and account for either canonical or representative steady jet mean flows as well as part, or all, of the testing apparatus. The results highlight how far the refraction/convection effects induced by the open jet flow and/or the reflection/diffraction effects coming from the testing apparatus may impact the acoustic measurements. All this further aids the assessment of acoustic installation effects that might be important in the type of testing typically done in anechoic wind tunnels, such as QFF. This also shows how CAA methods can facilitate the characterization of anechoic facilities, thus offering great potential in the advanced design of optimized aeroacoustic wind tunnels.
AB - This study focuses on acoustic installation effects that may occur during airframe noise experiments conducted in a typical open-jet anechoic wind tunnel, exemplified here by the NASA Langley Quiet Flow Facility (QFF). These acoustic installation effects are assessed through numerical simulation, using Computational Aeroacoustics (CAA). CAA calculations involve either elementary or complex noise sources and account for either canonical or representative steady jet mean flows as well as part, or all, of the testing apparatus. The results highlight how far the refraction/convection effects induced by the open jet flow and/or the reflection/diffraction effects coming from the testing apparatus may impact the acoustic measurements. All this further aids the assessment of acoustic installation effects that might be important in the type of testing typically done in anechoic wind tunnels, such as QFF. This also shows how CAA methods can facilitate the characterization of anechoic facilities, thus offering great potential in the advanced design of optimized aeroacoustic wind tunnels.
KW - Aeroacoustics
KW - Anechoic wind tunnel
KW - Computational Aeroacoustics (CAA)
KW - Environmental noise
KW - Installation effects
KW - Numerical simulation
UR - https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:000560356300016
UR - https://openalex.org/W3041136258
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85087513769
U2 - 10.1016/j.apacoust.2020.107469
DO - 10.1016/j.apacoust.2020.107469
M3 - Journal Article
SN - 0003-682X
VL - 169
JO - Applied Acoustics
JF - Applied Acoustics
M1 - 107469
ER -