TY - JOUR
T1 - Novel battery thermal management system with different shapes of pin fins
AU - Guo, Zengjia
AU - Zhao, Siyuan
AU - Wang, Jian
AU - Wang, Yang
AU - Zhai, Shuo
AU - Zhao, Tianshou
AU - Ni, Meng
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
PY - 2022/4
Y1 - 2022/4
N2 - Battery thermal management systems (BTMS) with favorable working performance are essential for lithium-ion battery inside the electrical vehicles. In this research, a novel BTMS is proposed by introducing vertically and horizontally arranged square pin fins (SPFs), circular pin fins (CPFs), and ellipse pin fins (EPFs) into the cold plate. The overall cooling performance (efficiency index: EI) of the proposed BTMS is evaluated numerically, considering both heat transfer and pressure loss. It is found that BTMS with SPFs always achieve the best cooling performance but is penalized with a higher pressure loss. EPFs-arranged BTMS can achieve the lowest pressure loss due to the excellent streamlined structure, but its cooling performance is also the lowest among these three different pin fin shapes. Considering both heat transfer and pressure loss, CPFs can be the best choice for BTMS when pin fins are vertically arranged, due to the favorable cooling performance and acceptable pressure loss caused by CPFs. However, the pressure loss is larger for all horizontally arranged pin fins. Considering both heat transfer and friction factor, SPFs are recommended for BTMS because of the greater enhancement of heat transfer.
AB - Battery thermal management systems (BTMS) with favorable working performance are essential for lithium-ion battery inside the electrical vehicles. In this research, a novel BTMS is proposed by introducing vertically and horizontally arranged square pin fins (SPFs), circular pin fins (CPFs), and ellipse pin fins (EPFs) into the cold plate. The overall cooling performance (efficiency index: EI) of the proposed BTMS is evaluated numerically, considering both heat transfer and pressure loss. It is found that BTMS with SPFs always achieve the best cooling performance but is penalized with a higher pressure loss. EPFs-arranged BTMS can achieve the lowest pressure loss due to the excellent streamlined structure, but its cooling performance is also the lowest among these three different pin fin shapes. Considering both heat transfer and pressure loss, CPFs can be the best choice for BTMS when pin fins are vertically arranged, due to the favorable cooling performance and acceptable pressure loss caused by CPFs. However, the pressure loss is larger for all horizontally arranged pin fins. Considering both heat transfer and friction factor, SPFs are recommended for BTMS because of the greater enhancement of heat transfer.
KW - battery
KW - cooling
KW - modeling
KW - pin fins
KW - pressure loss
KW - thermal management system
UR - https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:000729586100001
UR - https://openalex.org/W4200484478
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85120960811
U2 - 10.1002/er.7539
DO - 10.1002/er.7539
M3 - Journal Article
SN - 0363-907X
VL - 46
SP - 5997
EP - 6011
JO - International Journal of Energy Research
JF - International Journal of Energy Research
IS - 5
ER -