TY - JOUR
T1 - Reducing embodied carbon in concrete materials
T2 - A state-of-the-art review
AU - Chen, Siwei
AU - Teng, Yue
AU - Zhang, Yang
AU - Leung, Christopher K.Y.
AU - Pan, Wei
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022
PY - 2023/1
Y1 - 2023/1
N2 - The construction sector is responsible for about 40% of energy-related emissions worldwide. Utilizing low-carbon concrete materials (LCCMs) has been recognized as an efficient way to reduce embodied carbon (EC). However, there is a lack of systematic understanding and a unified comparison of the LCCMs’ EC reduction potentials. This paper identifies publications related to LCCMs and conducts a content analysis in three dialectical dimensions. Identified LCCMs were categorized into four divisions. The results show that the most prospective LCCMs are low-carbon cementitious binders, achieving 52.6% EC reductions. The results also demonstrate the significance of comparing the EC reduction potentials of different LCCMs at a unified level, as up to 11% inconsistency was identified when switching between cement & concrete level and components & building level. It provides a theoretical foundation for researchers and practitioners to examine possible LCCMs. The findings reveal new directions for achieving a more reliable cross-case comparison among the EC reduction potentials of different LCCMs.
AB - The construction sector is responsible for about 40% of energy-related emissions worldwide. Utilizing low-carbon concrete materials (LCCMs) has been recognized as an efficient way to reduce embodied carbon (EC). However, there is a lack of systematic understanding and a unified comparison of the LCCMs’ EC reduction potentials. This paper identifies publications related to LCCMs and conducts a content analysis in three dialectical dimensions. Identified LCCMs were categorized into four divisions. The results show that the most prospective LCCMs are low-carbon cementitious binders, achieving 52.6% EC reductions. The results also demonstrate the significance of comparing the EC reduction potentials of different LCCMs at a unified level, as up to 11% inconsistency was identified when switching between cement & concrete level and components & building level. It provides a theoretical foundation for researchers and practitioners to examine possible LCCMs. The findings reveal new directions for achieving a more reliable cross-case comparison among the EC reduction potentials of different LCCMs.
KW - Carbon reduction
KW - Embodied carbon
KW - Low-carbon building
KW - Low-carbon concrete material
KW - Low-carbon construction
UR - https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:000864440100004
UR - https://openalex.org/W4296222139
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85138122888
U2 - 10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106653
DO - 10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106653
M3 - Journal Article
SN - 0921-3449
VL - 188
JO - Resources, Conservation and Recycling
JF - Resources, Conservation and Recycling
M1 - 106653
ER -