TY - JOUR
T1 - Remote monitoring in the home validates clinical gait measures for multiple sclerosis
AU - Supratak, Akara
AU - Datta, Gourab
AU - Gafson, Arie R.
AU - Nicholas, Richard
AU - Guo, Yike
AU - Matthews, Paul M.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Supratak, Datta, Gafson, Nicholas, Guo and Matthews.
PY - 2018/7/13
Y1 - 2018/7/13
N2 - Background: The timed 25-foot walk (T25FW) is widely used as a clinic performance measure, but has yet to be directly validated against gait speed in the home environment. Objectives: To develop an accurate method for remote assessment of walking speed and to test how predictive the clinic T25FW is for real-life walking. Methods: An AX3-Axivity tri-axial accelerometer was positioned on 32 MS patients (Expanded Disability Status Scale [EDSS] 0-6) in the clinic, who subsequently wore it at home for up to 7 days. Gait speed was calculated from these data using both a model developed with healthy volunteers and individually personalized models generated from a machine learning algorithm. Results: The healthy volunteer model predicted gait speed poorly for more disabled people with MS. However, the accuracy of individually personalized models was high regardless of disability (R-value = 0.98, p-value = 1.85 × 10-22). With the latter, we confirmed that the clinic T25FW is strongly predictive of the maximum sustained gait speed in the home environment (R-value = 0.89, p-value = 4.34 × 10-8). Conclusion: Remote gait monitoring with individually personalized models is accurate for patients with MS. Using these models, we have directly validated the clinical meaningfulness (i.e., predictiveness) of the clinic T25FW for the first time.
AB - Background: The timed 25-foot walk (T25FW) is widely used as a clinic performance measure, but has yet to be directly validated against gait speed in the home environment. Objectives: To develop an accurate method for remote assessment of walking speed and to test how predictive the clinic T25FW is for real-life walking. Methods: An AX3-Axivity tri-axial accelerometer was positioned on 32 MS patients (Expanded Disability Status Scale [EDSS] 0-6) in the clinic, who subsequently wore it at home for up to 7 days. Gait speed was calculated from these data using both a model developed with healthy volunteers and individually personalized models generated from a machine learning algorithm. Results: The healthy volunteer model predicted gait speed poorly for more disabled people with MS. However, the accuracy of individually personalized models was high regardless of disability (R-value = 0.98, p-value = 1.85 × 10-22). With the latter, we confirmed that the clinic T25FW is strongly predictive of the maximum sustained gait speed in the home environment (R-value = 0.89, p-value = 4.34 × 10-8). Conclusion: Remote gait monitoring with individually personalized models is accurate for patients with MS. Using these models, we have directly validated the clinical meaningfulness (i.e., predictiveness) of the clinic T25FW for the first time.
KW - Actigraphy
KW - Biomarkers
KW - Gait
KW - Multiple sclerosis
KW - Real world data
KW - Remote sensing technology
UR - https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:000438533200001
UR - https://openalex.org/W2883576155
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85050163855
U2 - 10.3389/fneur.2018.00561
DO - 10.3389/fneur.2018.00561
M3 - Journal Article
SN - 1664-2295
VL - 9
JO - Frontiers in Neurology
JF - Frontiers in Neurology
IS - JUL
M1 - 561
ER -