Abstract
Wang and Feng [1] pointed out that the deduction in [2] overlooked the validity of the perturbation theorem used in [2]. In this paper, we show that, when the perturbation theorem is invalid, the probability of successful superresolution is very low. Therefore, we only have to derive the limits under the condition that validates the perturbation theorem, as done in [2].
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 847 |
| Number of pages | 1 |
| Journal | IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence |
| Volume | 28 |
| Issue number | 5 |
| DOIs |
|
| Publication status | Published - May 2006 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Perturbation theory
- Reconstruction-based algorithms
- Superresolution
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Response to the comments on "Fundamental limits of reconstruction-based superresolution algorithms under local translation"'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver