TY - GEN
T1 - Sensitivity evaluation of a transport-based turbulent cavitation model
AU - Vaidyanathan, Rajkumar
AU - Senocak, Inanc
AU - Wu, Jiongyang
AU - Shyy, Wei
PY - 2002
Y1 - 2002
N2 - A sensitivity analysis is done for turbulent cavitating flows using a pressure-based Navier-Stokes solver coupled with a phase volume fraction transport model and non-equilibrium k-ε turbulence closure. Four modeling parameters are adopted for evaluation, namely, Cε1 and Cε2, which directly influences the production and dissipation of turbulence kinetic energy, and Cdest and Cprod, which regulate the evaporation and condensation of the phases. Response surface methodology along with design of experiments is used for the sensitivity studies. The difference between the computational and experimental results is used to judge the model fidelity. Under non-cavitating conditions, the best selections of Cε1 and Cε2, exhibit a linear combination with multiple optima. Using this information, cavitating flows around an axi-symmetric geometry with a hemispherical fore-body and the NACA66(MOD) airfoil are assessed. Analysis of the cavitating model shows that the favorable combinations of Cdest and Cprod, are inversely proportional to each other for the geometries considered. A set of cavitation numbers is selected for each of the geometries to demonstrate the predictive capability of the present modeling approach for attached, turbulent cavitating flows.
AB - A sensitivity analysis is done for turbulent cavitating flows using a pressure-based Navier-Stokes solver coupled with a phase volume fraction transport model and non-equilibrium k-ε turbulence closure. Four modeling parameters are adopted for evaluation, namely, Cε1 and Cε2, which directly influences the production and dissipation of turbulence kinetic energy, and Cdest and Cprod, which regulate the evaporation and condensation of the phases. Response surface methodology along with design of experiments is used for the sensitivity studies. The difference between the computational and experimental results is used to judge the model fidelity. Under non-cavitating conditions, the best selections of Cε1 and Cε2, exhibit a linear combination with multiple optima. Using this information, cavitating flows around an axi-symmetric geometry with a hemispherical fore-body and the NACA66(MOD) airfoil are assessed. Analysis of the cavitating model shows that the favorable combinations of Cdest and Cprod, are inversely proportional to each other for the geometries considered. A set of cavitation numbers is selected for each of the geometries to demonstrate the predictive capability of the present modeling approach for attached, turbulent cavitating flows.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84896893095
M3 - Conference Paper published in a book
AN - SCOPUS:84896893095
SN - 9781624101137
T3 - 32nd AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference and Exhibit
BT - 32nd AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference and Exhibit
T2 - 32nd AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference and Exhibit 2002
Y2 - 24 June 2002 through 26 June 2002
ER -