TY - JOUR
T1 - Sensitivity evaluation of a transport-based turbulent cavitation model
AU - Vaidyanathan, Rajkumar
AU - Senocak, Inanc
AU - Wu, Jiongyang
AU - Shyy, Wei
PY - 2003/5
Y1 - 2003/5
N2 - A sensitivity analysis is done for turbulent cavitating flows using a pressure-based Navier-Stokes solver coupled with a phase volume fraction transport model and nonequilibrium k-ε turbulence closure. Four modeling parameters are assessed, namely, Cε1 and Cε2, which directly influence the production and destruction of the dissipation of turbulence kinetic energy, and Cdest and Cprod, which regulate the evaporation and condensation of the phases. Response surface methodology along with design of experiments is used for the sensitivity studies. The difference between the computational and experimental results is used to judge the model fidelity. Under noncavitating conditions, the best selections of Cε1 and Cε2 exhibit a linear combination with multiple optima. Using this information, cavitating flows around an axisymmetric geometry with a hemispherical fore-body and the NACA66(MOD) foil section are assessed. Analysis of the cavitating model has identified favorable combinations of Cdest, and Cprod. The selected model parameters are found to work well for different geometries with different cavitation numbers for attached cavity. It is also confirmed that the cavitation model parameters employed in the literature are within the range identified in the present study.
AB - A sensitivity analysis is done for turbulent cavitating flows using a pressure-based Navier-Stokes solver coupled with a phase volume fraction transport model and nonequilibrium k-ε turbulence closure. Four modeling parameters are assessed, namely, Cε1 and Cε2, which directly influence the production and destruction of the dissipation of turbulence kinetic energy, and Cdest and Cprod, which regulate the evaporation and condensation of the phases. Response surface methodology along with design of experiments is used for the sensitivity studies. The difference between the computational and experimental results is used to judge the model fidelity. Under noncavitating conditions, the best selections of Cε1 and Cε2 exhibit a linear combination with multiple optima. Using this information, cavitating flows around an axisymmetric geometry with a hemispherical fore-body and the NACA66(MOD) foil section are assessed. Analysis of the cavitating model has identified favorable combinations of Cdest, and Cprod. The selected model parameters are found to work well for different geometries with different cavitation numbers for attached cavity. It is also confirmed that the cavitation model parameters employed in the literature are within the range identified in the present study.
UR - https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:000183646900006
UR - https://openalex.org/W2084072266
U2 - 10.1115/1.1566048
DO - 10.1115/1.1566048
M3 - Review article
SN - 0098-2202
VL - 125
SP - 447
EP - 458
JO - Journal of Fluids Engineering, Transactions of the ASME
JF - Journal of Fluids Engineering, Transactions of the ASME
IS - 3
ER -