The bipolarity of momentary affect: Reply to Schimmack

Michelle Yik

doi:10.1080/02699930902784321

The bipolarity of momentary affect: Reply to Schimmack

Michelle Yik^*

^*Corresponding author for this work

Division of Social Science

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In his commentary on my paper (Yik, 2007), Schimmack (2009 this issue) reanalysed the published correlations and concluded that dialectical thinking moderates bipolarity in rating momentary affect. In this response, I attempt to integrate our interpretations of the data. Overall, bipolarity prevails in all five language groups. At one point of time, when one is happy, one is not sad. The explanations for the small differences provide avenues for future research.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	605-610
Number of pages	6
Journal	Cognition and Emotion
Volume	23
Issue number	3
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930902784321
Publication status	Published - 2009

Keywords

Bipolarity
Circumplex
Momentary affect

Access to Document

10.1080/02699930902784321

Cite this

@article{99b98221977d4916aae84b413b20c99b,

title = "The bipolarity of momentary affect: Reply to Schimmack",

abstract = "In his commentary on my paper (Yik, 2007), Schimmack (2009 this issue) reanalysed the published correlations and concluded that dialectical thinking moderates bipolarity in rating momentary affect. In this response, I attempt to integrate our interpretations of the data. Overall, bipolarity prevails in all five language groups. At one point of time, when one is happy, one is not sad. The explanations for the small differences provide avenues for future research.",

keywords = "Bipolarity, Circumplex, Momentary affect",

author = "Michelle Yik",

year = "2009",

doi = "10.1080/02699930902784321",

language = "English",

volume = "23",

pages = "605--610",

journal = "Cognition and Emotion",

issn = "0269-9931",

publisher = "Routledge",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The bipolarity of momentary affect

T2 - Reply to Schimmack

AU - Yik, Michelle

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - In his commentary on my paper (Yik, 2007), Schimmack (2009 this issue) reanalysed the published correlations and concluded that dialectical thinking moderates bipolarity in rating momentary affect. In this response, I attempt to integrate our interpretations of the data. Overall, bipolarity prevails in all five language groups. At one point of time, when one is happy, one is not sad. The explanations for the small differences provide avenues for future research.

AB - In his commentary on my paper (Yik, 2007), Schimmack (2009 this issue) reanalysed the published correlations and concluded that dialectical thinking moderates bipolarity in rating momentary affect. In this response, I attempt to integrate our interpretations of the data. Overall, bipolarity prevails in all five language groups. At one point of time, when one is happy, one is not sad. The explanations for the small differences provide avenues for future research.

KW - Bipolarity

KW - Circumplex

KW - Momentary affect

UR - https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:000264345600012

UR - https://openalex.org/W2046270106

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/68049127525

U2 - 10.1080/02699930902784321

DO - 10.1080/02699930902784321

M3 - Comment/debate

SN - 0269-9931

VL - 23

SP - 605

EP - 610

JO - Cognition and Emotion

JF - Cognition and Emotion

IS - 3

ER -

The bipolarity of momentary affect: Reply to Schimmack

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this