The persistence of informal finance

Kellee S. Tsai*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Chapter in Book/Conference Proceeding/ReportBook Chapterpeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Regardless of regime type, most developing countries face the challenge of providing credit to lower-income portions of their rural populations (Bouman and Hospes 1994; Hoff, Braverman, and Stiglitz 1993). China and India are no exceptions. Due to perceived deficiencies in the formal financial system, in both countries the state has attempted to alleviate rural poverty by establishing government microfinance programs. Even with such programs, however, small business owners and farmers in both China and India rely primarily on curb market finance. Indeed, in some cases, the scale of informal finance actually increases in communities targeted with more official credit. One of the reasons that even an expanded supply of formal finance is insufficient to meet demand is because state policies are seldom implemented properly. Furthermore, the reality of segmented credit markets at the local level means that government microfinance programs often fail to reach their intended clientele. Developmental outcomes often deviate from state intentions due to complex political and economic dynamics at the local level.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationAsia's Giants
Subtitle of host publicationComparing China and India
PublisherPalgrave Macmillan
Pages123-140
Number of pages18
ISBN (Electronic)9781403978295
ISBN (Print)9781403971104
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2005
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The persistence of informal finance'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this