Abstract
Prior to engaging in a substantive discussion on the supposed influence of neoliberalism on research in work and organizational psychology (WOP), it is important to verify the empirical basis of the trends advanced by Bal and Dóci (Neoliberal ideology in work and organizational psychology, European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology [Online First Publication, 2018]). To this end, we content analysed 745 abstracts of empirical studies published in leading WOP journals during the years 2006–2007 and 2016–2017. Results of our content analysis do not support the hypothesized trends towards more instrumentality and individualism in WOP research, suggesting that Bal and Dóci’s (2018) portrayal of the WOP literature does not provide a solid basis for discussion. On the basis of our findings, we conclude with recommendations to broaden the scope of WOP research to also include macro-level, societal issues.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 549-551 |
| Number of pages | 3 |
| Journal | European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology |
| Volume | 27 |
| Issue number | 5 |
| Early online date | 17 Jul 2018 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Sept 2018 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2018, © 2018 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
Keywords
- Work and organizational psychology
- neoliberal
- review
- meta-analysis
- philosophy of science
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Our neoliberal fantasies? A preliminary test of research trends in leading journals in work and organizational psychology'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver